Evaluation of aerosol-spectrometer based PM2.5 and PM10 mass concentration measurement using ambient-like model aerosols in the laboratory

Page view(s)
567
Checked on Aug 09, 2024
Evaluation of aerosol-spectrometer based PM2.5 and PM10 mass concentration measurement using ambient-like model aerosols in the laboratory
Title:
Evaluation of aerosol-spectrometer based PM2.5 and PM10 mass concentration measurement using ambient-like model aerosols in the laboratory
Journal Title:
Measurement
Publication Date:
19 August 2022
Citation:
Wu, T. Y., Horender, S., Tancev, G., & Vasilatou, K. (2022). Evaluation of aerosol-spectrometer based PM2.5 and PM10 mass concentration measurement using ambient-like model aerosols in the laboratory. Measurement, 201, 111761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111761
Abstract:
We have evaluated the PM10 and PM2.5 measurement using a Grimm 11-D optical particle size spectrometer (OPSS) with ambient-like aerosols generated in a laboratory. The ambient-like model aerosols include fresh soot, aged soot, ammonium sulfate, ammonium nitrate and Arizona Road Dust (ARD) particles. The mass concentration (MC) of test aerosols has been computed from the particle counts, equivalent particle volume and particle effective density using a proposed method. The expanded measurement uncertainties for the computed MC are estimated to be 27 − 36%, with detailed uncertainty analysis. The deviation of the computed MC from the reference gravimetric values is below 20% for MC levels from 29 to 1584 µg/m³ (deviation is smaller than that reported by firmware of Grimm 11-D for most cases). The computed MC agree with the reference MC within their expanded measurement uncertainties. The underestimation and overestimation of the computed MC at various MC levels have been explained based on OPSS sizing errors related to the light-scattering, irregular-shaped dust particles and light absorption of the soot particles. The proposed MC computation method is useful to evaluate the accuracy of OPSS in PM10 and PM2.5 measurement with the lab-generated model aerosols. This method can also be used to compare the performance of various OPSS-based PM monitors via inter-laboratory comparisons.
License type:
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Funding Info:
METAS was supported by Innosuisse (grant number: 36779.1 IPENG) and by internal funds.
Description:
ISSN:
0263-2241