Laboratory-Scale Life-Cycle Assessment: A Comparison of Existing and Emerging Methods of Poly(ε-caprolactone) Synthesis

Page view(s)
1
Checked on Jan 25, 2022
Laboratory-Scale Life-Cycle Assessment: A Comparison of Existing and Emerging Methods of Poly(ε-caprolactone) Synthesis
Title:
Laboratory-Scale Life-Cycle Assessment: A Comparison of Existing and Emerging Methods of Poly(ε-caprolactone) Synthesis
Other Titles:
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Publication Date:
16 December 2020
Citation:
Ang, P., Mothe, S. R., Chennamaneni, L. R., Aidil, F., Khoo, H. H., & Thoniyot, P. (2020). Laboratory-Scale Life-Cycle Assessment: A Comparison of Existing and Emerging Methods of Poly(ε-caprolactone) Synthesis. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 9(2), 669–683. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c06247
Abstract:
Poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) is a widely employed biodegradable polymer synthesized commercially using stannous octoate-mediated ring-opening polymerization (ROP) of ε-caprolactone (ε-CL). It needs to be revisited in alignment with green chemistry principles, such as less hazardous chemical syntheses. We identified and optimized two emerging methods—Route A: acid-catalyzed ROP of ε-CL using hydrogen chloride (HCl) in diethyl ether; and Route B: free-radical ROP using cyclic ketene acetal (CKA) monomer, 2-methylene-1,3-dioxepane (MDO), which are essentially solvent-free, metal-free, and organic-catalyst-free. They were then compared with the laboratory-scale reproduction of Route C: stannous octoate-mediated ROP of ε-CL. Laboratory-scale life-cycle assessment (LCA) is employed to analyze the potential environmental profiles of these three routes by employing a cradle-to-gate system boundary, starting from extraction of raw materials and ending with production of 1 g of PCL homopolymer. The overall findings showed that Route A, the low-temperature acid-catalyzed approach, was more power-efficient and less hazardous compared to Routes B and C, with consideration of sensitivity and uncertainty analysis results. Route A was demonstrated to be the most environmentally sustainable route with environmental impact reductions of 79.46% (climate change), 54.53% (fossil fuel depletion), 45.10% (terrestrial acidification), and 66.36% (water depletion) per 1 g of PCL, in contrast to Route B. In comparison to Route C, Route A achieved 43.54% (fine particulate matter formation) and 98.41% (human toxicity) impact reductions per 1 g of PCL. Route B contributes largely to climate change, whereas Route C has the most significant influence on human toxicity.
License type:
Publisher Copyright
Funding Info:
This research / project is supported by the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR) - IAF-PP_ Specialty Chemicals Programme
Grant Reference no. : A1786a0025
Description:
This document is the Accepted Manuscript version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, copyright © American Chemical Society after peer review and technical editing by the publisher. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c06247.
ISSN:
2168-0485
Files uploaded:

Files uploaded: