Enhanced In Vitro Osteogenic Differentiation in Human MSCs Attached to 3D Microcarriers versus 2D Monolayers

Page view(s)
12
Checked on Mar 25, 2024
Enhanced In Vitro Osteogenic Differentiation in Human MSCs Attached to 3D Microcarriers versus 2D Monolayers
Title:
Enhanced In Vitro Osteogenic Differentiation in Human MSCs Attached to 3D Microcarriers versus 2D Monolayers
Journal Title:
BMC Biotechnology
Keywords:
Publication Date:
31 October 2015
Citation:
Shekaran A, Sim E, Tan KY, et al. Enhanced in vitro osteogenic differentiation of human fetal MSCs attached to 3D microcarriers versus harvested from 2D monolayers. BMC Biotechnol. 2015;15:102. Published 2015 Oct 31. doi:10.1186/s12896-015-0219-8
Abstract:
Background: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are of great interest in bone regenerative medicine due to their osteogenic potential and trophic effects. However, challenges to large-scale production of MSCs can hinder the translation of MSC therapies. 3D Microcarrier (MC)-based MSC culture presents a scalable and cost-effective alternative to conventional methods of expansion in 2D monolayers. Furthermore, biodegradable MCs may allow for MC-bound MSC delivery without enzymatic harvest for selected applications such as bone healing. However, the effects of cell expansion on microcarriers and enzymatic cell harvest on MSC phenotype and osteogenic differential potential are not well understood. In this study, we characterized human fetal MSCs (hfMSCs) after expansion in 3D microcarrier spinner or 2D monolayer cultures. Following expansion, we compared osteogenic differentiation of cultures seeded with 3D MC-harvested, 3D MC-bound and conventional 2D monolayer (MNL)-harvested cells when cultured in osteogenic induction media on collagen-coated plates. Results: Fetal MSCs expanded on both 3D agitated Microcarriers (MC) and 2D Plastic static monolayer (MNL) cultures express high levels of MSC surface markers. MC-harvested hfMSCs displayed higher expression of early osteogenic genes but slower mineralization kinetics compared to MNL-harvested MSCs during osteogenic induction. However, in the comparison between MC-bound and MC-harvested hfMSCs, osteogenic genes were upregulated and mineralization kinetics was accelerated in the former condition. Importantly, 3D MC-bound hfMSCs expressed higher levels of osteogenic genes and displayed either higher or equivalent levels of mineralization, depending on the cell line, compared to the classical monolayer cultures use in the literature (MNL-harvested hfMSCs). Conclusion: Beyond the processing and scalability advantages of the microcarrier culture, hfMSCs attached to MCs undergo robust osteogenic differentiation and mineralization compared to enzymatically harvested cells. Thus biodegradable/biocompatible MCs which can potentially be used for cell expansion as well as a scaffold for direct in vivo delivery of cells may have advantages over the current methods of monolayer-expansion and delivery post-harvest for bone regeneration applications.
License type:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Funding Info:
This research / project is supported by Bioprocessing Technology Institute, A*STAR
Description:
ISSN:
1472-6750
Files uploaded: