Psychometric Properties of the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Instrument in Singapore

Psychometric Properties of the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Instrument in Singapore
Title:
Psychometric Properties of the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Instrument in Singapore
Other Titles:
PLoS ONE
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0136759
Keywords:
Publication Date:
03 September 2015
Citation:
Venkataraman K, Tan LSM, Bautista DCT, Griva K, Zuniga YLM, Amir M, et al. (2015) Psychometric Properties of the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Instrument in Singapore. PLoS ONE 10(9): e0136759. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136759
Abstract:
Background Emotional distress is an important dimension in diabetes, and several instruments have been developed to measure this aspect. The Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scale is one such instrument which has demonstrated validity and reliability in Western populations, but its psychometric properties in Asian populations have not been examined. Methods This was a secondary analysis of data from patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus recruited through convenience sampling from a diabetes specialist outpatient clinic in Singapore. The following psychometric properties were assessed: Construct validity through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch analysis, concurrent validity through correlation with related scales (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, Diabetes Health Profile—psychological distress, Audit of Diabetes Dependent Quality of Life), reliability through assessment of internal consistency and floor and ceiling effects, and sensitivity by estimating effect sizes for known clinical and social functioning groups. Results 203 patients with mean age of 45±12 years were analysed. None of the previously published model structures achieved a good fit on CFA. On Rasch analysis, four items showed poor fit and were removed. The abridged 16-item PAID mapped to a single latent trait, with a high degree of internal consistency (Cronbach ɑ 0.95), but significant floor effect (24.6% scoring at floor). Both 20-item and 16-item PAID scores were moderately correlated with scores of related scales, and sensitive to differences in clinical and social functioning groups, with large effect sizes for glycemic control and diabetes related complications, nephropathy and neuropathy. Conclusion The abridged 16-item PAID measures a single latent trait of emotional distress due to diabetes whereas the 20-item PAID appears to measures more than one latent trait. However, both the 16-item and 20-item PAID versions are valid, reliable and sensitive for use among Singaporean patients with diabetes.
License type:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Funding Info:
Description:
ISSN:
1932-6203
Files uploaded:

File Size Format Action
6.pdf 490.20 KB PDF Open